Like a Snake Eating It’s Own Tail

Just when I thought there might be a let up in the humor department of my life, another unexpected event occurs. This past Friday I received a phone call from a principal of a charter school. In and of itself this was funny as I did not apply for any job with a charter school so some one had to know a couple things about me (1) I have a teaching credential (2) I am back in America (3) obtain my new phone number.  It turns out that last year when I was subbing, I was appreciated at some school and was referred on to this principal. The amazing part was I subbed at a school for the sub agency which has gone out of its way to be, frankly mean spirited.  So, in spite of the sub agency perception, I was valued somewhere.
I was invited in for a cursory interview. I wanted to go if nothing more than to find out why on earth in a state where everyone who had anything to do with education (and quite probably their uncle, dog, the salmon in the river (and so on) were given pink slips on March 15, there was an opening for a science teacher and there must be some one who most likely did apply for the job.  Now this was funny, in an interesting sort of way.

So, I did my research – always an essential step for any job. Most people do not realize that as much as an employer is interviewing you, you should in turn be interviewing them! Do you want to work there (always depends on how desperate you are)?  I could be a trash person if the pay was right.  I found out the founder of this charter school system actually thinks in a similar manner to me, which is to say it is not significant enough to get a student out of high school, the proof in the pudding is when said student obtains a college diploma. All schools are charged with making students ready for college so charter schools have to meet this requirement as well as any other public school, which is to say it is not a cause for celebration of what makes them different.  This made me really want to go to the interview.

I went to said interview and was pleasantly surprised. The principal was able to clearly articulate what made this charter school different and what things the principal did.  The principal was able to explain how much time they were able to spend in the classroom (partly due to burdensome administrative tasks being done at a corporate office) each week and what their special education teacher was able to accomplish.  I met with teachers and students and had the freedom to ask questions (absolutely amazing as most charter schools control this process and literally stage a visit).  Not everything was perfect, nor did I expect it to be. Not everything was awful – which did surprise me. This school did not have the rampant staff turnover typical of charter schools. There was not a noticeable ‘behavioral/attitude’ problem with students. 

By the end of the visit and interview, I was happy and actually felt encouraged that perhaps some one was able to have a functional charter school model.  I was encouraged enough to write a thank you note and hope for a call back. This was something I would not have thought possible after my last official teaching job.

Reading between the hyperbole of tax saving corruption misconduct used against independent contractors

In recent weeks many businesses/corporations have been taken to task for misclassifying employees in order to find loopholes in taxation. On one hand I commend these CFO’s for creativity and I commend the various peoples who work for these companies in order to put food on the table and a roof over their head. What I worry about is the peril with which so many people work under a status that is not only deceptive for taxation, but even more malicious for unemployment.

Corporations pay into the state and federal pool of unemployment taxes. This fund was made to help people when times are rough and tough (2007-?) and assist them until such time they can find reasonable employment where they can afford food and rent and quite possibly squeeze in some health insurance. Independent contractors, while paying tons in taxes with few write offs, have to also save up for their own rainy day fund as unemployment is not available for them in between ‘gigs’, which, as a sometimes independent contractor myself, has been more often than not lately.

Most people do not understand that not only do corporations get a tax boost by misclassifying employees, they get a boost in not having to pay out on unemployment. The problem is that while taxes may affect the corporate bottom line and its investors, independent contractors who lose out end up effecting everyone when they can not pay bills. There is no back up plan/plan B/safety net and this is bad for everyone. Unfortunately, most people did not realize the problem until it was too late – until they were let go from their independent contractor status.

Not only does independent contractor status do everything mentioned above, imagine what it does to the unemployment statistics……so, while the corporate bigs were having their day on the backs of other, we were all hoping the economy would reach bottom. I personally think we have not reached bottom merely because there are so many unknowns falling around us and no one knows how to get out of the way or build a net.

Money is not always the answer in education

Economists have a vested interest in a successful and educated population as well as a creative and innovative workforce, which is why Harvard Economist Roland Fryer Jr. is researching incentivisation. Incentivisation is the effect of paying some one to learn at the K-12 school level. Fryer, who was one of Time Magazines Influential People in 2009, has been working within multiple school districts across the United States to evaluate the efficacy of money in educational motivation.
As part of the ever improving and changing terrain in education, what works does not always grow and bloom as expected. Incentivizing (‘pay’ in the broad sense for grades or scores) students is nothing new and in fact relies heavily upon operant conditioning. Operant conditioning is way of learning that enforces good behavior with rewards and discourages bad behavior through punishment. Nothing new under the Pavlovian sun has yet made grasslands into forest. It appears society is running up against the dual ‘seed’ concepts of motivation and locus of control, both of which seem to have genetic and environmental contributions and make the classroom/workplace blossom with creativity and innovation. Both locus of control and motivation have far reaching impacts beyond the classroom so the research is incredibly important to follow.
What is most interesting is how incentivization plays out and how the potential to manipulate this curious force of mind over matter can make classrooms better.
To date, the research (what research? Fryer’s research) indicates that younger children can be tempted with pay for reading and easily weaned off of this simple incentive. As children age up, the incentive of money seems to be less reliable and more addictive in order for the individual to have follow through. The most interesting part of the research (what research?) is that standardized test scores can improve for older children. However, it is only standardized test scores that seem to benefit. The issue at hand is whether or not incentives lead to life long learning, creativity or personal satisfaction – all which would require more substantial longitudinal studies.
It seems the human animal continues to be motivated by food, sex and power (which can be in the form of wealth) although none of these consistently and reliably lead to anything more than getting the dog to the kibble bowl and making it eat.
I commend Mr. Fryer for pursuing research to evaluate what would make education work better although it seems in contradiction with what we really want to know – how do we make people learn better? Internal locus of control seems to be the defining factor both for success through determination (self efficacy) and the willingness, not the inherent ability, to learn. How do we as a culture support empowerment, which is a belief of control of oneself and ones immediate environment and is in conflict with the concept of corruption? While locus of control may correlate to money, I think it wise to pursue the economics of self confidence and habituating a life of joy in learning for its own self worth.

One reason CA is creating a debt monkey on it’s own back….

Since I never tire of good humor and believe EVERYONE is entitled to a good laugh, I am continuing on with my ‘new’ 2010 unemployment saga. To be deprived of what I received in the mail today would be bad form and prevent all of you from laughing with me.
Here is a brief recap to get you up to why today is hilarious: I was a substitute teacher in 2009 until June 15. I gave notice as the agency I worked for could not provide summer work (there is no summer school or need for subs in CA during the summer). I continued looking for work – anything to pay my bills. Back in May 2009 I received a contract from Maria Soti Girls Education Centre to be a consulting principal. I signed it and accepted it and the job was to begin 6 August 2009. In my mind I believed I could work up until I left the country if I could find a job. There is no shame in doing odd jobs, so I continued the search. Sadly, at the height of the meltdown in unemployment I had a couple things going against me – I have a MA degree and teaching credential, both completely useless when pink slips had been handed out in March 2009 like chocolate on Valentines Day. I was ‘overqualified’ for just about any job you can think of, and trust me, there were many I applied for and submitted on the back of each unemployment form even though there was not an X in the box requesting I do so.
Fast forward and I filled out paperwork for my father in Des Moines to be my power of attorney when I left the country and sent the paperwork to EDD as I wanted them to be able to find me. I worked (okay, I attempted to work but corruption literally and figuratively prevailed in spite of my best efforts). I found my personal safety in danger. I consulted with friends and family (I did not go to U.S. Embassy as everyone in Kenya hates Ambassador Rannenberger since Obama was elected and the U.S. has higher levels of accountability for Kenya) about what to do on the personal safety front and the corruption front. I declined to sign on an un-audited school bank account. I paid my own money for school repairs, etc. Ultimately, it was too unsafe and I believed that since I knew what was going on in the way of corruption at the school, if I could not intercede, I became culpable as well, not something I would ever desire to be party to. I resigned my position and came home. I applied for unemployment as when I left I had $5,000 banked benefits I had never used.
Forward to today: I contested the denial of unemployment from the sub agency I had worked for who retroactively (almost one year later) declined the claim on grounds I took a job that would pay less or be less unreliable. I had so hoped they would have shared this knowledge with me when I signed the contract for Kenya but I guess back in May they were not feeling the Nostradamus Effect so strongly because no one was asking them to pay unemployment insurance.
It was my right to contest the denial of benefits and I did. I filled out every form, responded in a timely manner, provided all documentation of above and even stated it seemed unfair for EDD to hold me accountable to a higher standard of proving unemployment when no teacher could find a job in the summer of 2009 and the sub agency barely could provide me with half time work at exceedingly low rates of pay, plus, I legitimately went to the ends of the earth (literally – 50 Km from the equator) to take a job I had expected to go for 3-5 years as I had previously been a Peace Corps Volunteer on the continent and wanted to go back and not for ‘vacation’.
On April 7, 2010 EDD sent a letter stating I was indeed entitled to unemployment. I filled out all the paperwork they sent and submitted it. I have waited for the unemployment checks. I am working as an independent contractor and was recently offered to work temporarily for the U.S. Government as a Census Bureau Enumerator to start on April 27th.

Today I received multiple envelopes from unemployment stating they could not pay me as I have contested the claim…….
Well, of course I did and then they realized indeed I was entitled to unemployment. Instead of paying me, EDD decided they would hold on to the paltry less than $1,000 and make me go to an administrative judge who will look at letter of April 7, 2010 and tell them to pay me. While I am not an economist, I do know that the interest on $1,000 for even three months is less than the cost of the paperwork, time, postage, etc. to go to the administrative judge so CA taxpayers are actually paying MORE for my unemployment claim then they should even have to. Although I should feel guilty, I am a CA taxpayer and will pay out the wazoo for my independent contractor status and NOT BE ENTITLED TO UNEMPLOYMENT for anything earned as an independent contractor.
This is how I keep laughing as I really, truly want to cry and just pay rent.
I thought about writing my CA State Senators but figured they have enough on their plate so I just put a tag to their name with this blog – obviously I am one of many going through this ridiculousness and maybe they want to evaluate it as they think about the State of CA budget. If you think this story is as funny as I do, write your Senator – get something for your tax dollars!

Update to most recent question asking EDD about my check:

Thank you for submitting your information to the Employment Development Department on 4/15/2010 at 1:35 PM.

Category:
Unemployment Insurance Benefits

Do NOT respond to this message through email. If you need additional information or assistance regarding this matter, contact us through the Ask EDD Web site. Be sure to select the same category and include your Reference Number: 2984181.

Topic:
Checks – Where is my check?

You wrote us the following:
While I continue to appreciate EDD using humor to delay paying me unemployment, I don’t think the administrative judge will find wasting the taxpayers dollars quite as funny. On 4/7/2010 your office sent me a letter stating I was awarded unemployment insurance in the amount of xxx/week. This claim was what I have been stating since January when EDD kept on denying the claim. Once the claim stopped being denied, I no longer need to see the administrative judge as I have been granted unemployment benefits – which is what I have been asking for and was contesting the denial of in all the paperwork I kept receiving and promptly replied to. I filled out all paper work and responded with documentation. I am now unclear why I would still need to see an administrative judge at even more cost to the taxpayers of CA when you already told me in a letter I now am ENTITLED to unemployment insurance. What might I do to encourage EDD to send the money owed to me and avoid going to an administrative judge. While it seems to save CA money by delaying payment to me in this circuitous paper trail, it is costly both to me and the judge to have to read papers of which the judge will surely say,’You gave her the letter stating she is entitled to unemployment insurance, please pay her.’ Please let me know what would be the best way to help EDD get its paperwork in order. I would hate to have an administrative judge laughing with me at incompetence.

Here is our reply:
The EDD has scheduled you to a telephone interview to resolve an issue of eligibility. Interviews are conducted by phone within the timeframe and date stated on the Telephone Interview Notification and Instruction notice DE4800/Z/mailed to you. Should the interviewer call and find you not available, the decision regarding your eligibility will be based on the information available to the Department. The Caller ID will display as “PRIVATE,” so please be sure to answer your telephone during the specified time. You may be asked to call 1-800-300-5616, or an alternate phone number may be left by the interviewer. The EDD interviewers have 10 days after the telephone interview to determine your eligibility. All checks/benefits will be delayed until a Determination decision has been made by the Department. A Notice of Determination (DE 1080) may be mailed to you when that decision is reached. Appeals may be filed within twenty (20) days of the issuance date if you are not satisfied with the decision. If the department finds you eligible, benefit payments will be processed for all certified eligible weeks. Please allow 7-10 days for mailing benefit checks.

Your Reference Number is 2984181.

Today I forwarded all of this to Mr. Swandre Swanson, Assembly member for District 16. This afternoon I spoke with Mr. Mickey Jones. I am going to Mr. Swanson’s office to sign a release of information so that he can review my file with EDD. In addition, I will bring all my copies of paperwork.

According to Crystal Ordonez at EDD who called me on the morning of 23 April 2010, the letter EDD sent was not a real letter, rather it was a letter of potential but they send potential letters to everyone. Yes, I can go to an administrative judge hearing but no one has a clue when that will be as they are backed up at least 3 months.

Update:  Our taxpayer dollars were used to confirm I acted in accordance with what a reasonable person would do.  The administrative judge awarded me my unemployment payments and stated I do not owe EDD anything.  There is a 20 day wait though as the other side can determine it would like to appeal and I suppose they will.

Further update 3 November 2010:  During the month of August 2010 I took a job which I thought was going to allow me to do something I love – teach science as a ‘kitchen’ cooking project. Unfortunately (it only took six weeks to figure this out in spite of desperately wanting to make it work) the business which hired me had little to no understanding of (1) science (2) professional issues surrounding the teaching of science, such as sanitation and safety.  After being asked to make cupcake batter (with eggs in the post salmonella scare CA) in a room that had not been adequately cleaned in five days due to ‘running out of cleaning and sanitizing supplies’ with children and then letting batter sit in refrigerator (to my knowledge not sanitized with bleach after having set idle for the summer) for five days before it could be baked (organization was not clear on concept at all of the point of experiment – how does baking powder make cupcakes ‘rise’) was more than I was willing to take on with my teaching credential. In fact, it was definitely more than I was willing to take on as I was studying for my pharmacy technician course work and if I could not identify sanitation in the classroom setting, I would have one hell of a time explaining it in a pharmacy where compounding and sterile processes were used.   So, I resigned.  In my mind, I had not ‘earned’ enough in unemployment to apply for it and my ‘punishment’ was to find another job and get it together.   Alas, unemployment contacted me……with a letter for an interview. Which I participated in for 45 minutes on 26 October 2010. Ultimately Ms. Solomon, who contacted me, asked for faxed copies of the e-mails which substantiate what I was saying (all the while being agasp at the story as her son attends an after school care program which does ‘cooking’).  Ms. Solomon stated she needed to make a decision and so I could not snail mail the paper work.  I spent $20 to fax the paperwork from the local Office Max and wouldn’t you know it, have heard nothing from EDD by e-mail, phone or snail mail.  I sent a message to EDD (#3682882) two days ago asking for some follow up……after all , they contacted me – I had not applied for unemployment.   As of this writing, no response.  I am unsure the $20 fax was of value to me, EDD or will even help me get another job nor help me spot stupidity in an employer faster…….

Update:  http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2010/11/07/state/n100503S24.DTL

Update: 24 November 2010 – After manually filling out the paperwork for unemployment again (per e-mail from unemployment) as I was told in writing,  by unemployment I can collect,

since “I did not attempt to defraud unemployment” ( impressive  they understood this  concept considering I neither contacted them initially nor even thought I was entitled due to not ‘banking’ enough from last job and I resigned – never a way to collect unemployment),

I then recieved the forms to fill out  as if the ‘claim’ had never closed…..which is ridiculous since they had just told me to fill out new forms and I needed to fill out a federal form since I had worked for the U.S. Census Bureau over the summer.

By now EDD has used at least two trees – just on me. Why??? I have not a clue but surely being disorganized and not streamlined keeps a great deal of my fellow Californian’s employed.

Hearing for the most recent craziness of November 3, 2010  is on 2/28/11 with Judge C. Stanley Snead

Outcome:  Employer ‘magically’ filed paperwork on 25 of March indicating they never meant to appeal my collecting unemployment.  Administrative judge worked to contact them and give them benefit of doubt they might show up – they did not so appeal was found in my favor.  Cost to me – $0 as I had to be in the general neighborhood for an interview at 1:00 PM; COST TO TAXPAYERS (you and me) – huge, all the paperwork, court time, judge time, etc.  Makes one wonder what is with employers and why EDD does not fine the employer for misuse of court system.  Why should our tax dollars go to support stupidity in HR?

And further proof the universe understands and was in full force: After the court hearing I walked about 1/2 mile to the local health foods market and ate lunch.  Afterwards, I was walking around inside and bumped into some one I recognized but could not remember from where….It was some one who was hired after me and just left the employer (of which I was in the appeals court today).   Why did this other person leave?  Same reason(s) as me, essentially the longer we had an affiliation with this crazy employer, the more likely we were to damage our own reputation so we had to cut our losses  AND employer was funded by our tax dollars..

And an update on 2/19/11

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2011/02/19/state/n064427S47.DTL

And an update on 3/3/2012

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2012/03/03/state/n195413S37.DTL&tsp=1

Where bullying might come from…….

Yesterday was one of the few days I was able to get to the library before it opened. At these times I am still often surprised by the shear number of people waiting to get into the library – there happened to be a diverse crowd by age and race and sex. Within the crowd were parents with children under 10. The parent/child group is the one I usually find most interesting to observe as the parent child relationship is so very interesting and telling.
Although I observe in silence, I must have a face that lends itself for people to talk to me – and they do. I could be on the subway in NYC, a train in Italy, coffee anywhere and people talk to me. So a gentleman probably in his late 50′s to early 60′s started talking with me as he was apparently making the same observation as myself.
I happened to be observing a mother and probably eight year old boy. At one point I had to back up as the mother and the child were pushing each other and rough housing. I didn’t mind, there was plenty of space for everyone, I just did not feel like being bumped as I had my laptop in my backpack. The mother and child were hip bumping, body thrusting and wacking each other, at first playfully and then the boy began to get more aggressive, including intentionally and quite hard, stepping on the mothers feet. She kept stating in an escalating voice she had a nice shield around her which seemed to be what was making the boy act up, as if to get through the ‘nice’ shield.
Suffice it to say, I was not the only person who backed up. I was not the only person to feel the interaction was somewhat inappropriate and not quite ‘loving’ as one might expect from a parent and child on a trip to the library. I said nothing to the mother.
Eventually the man started talking to me about how his wife would not tolerate that behavior from their children – she was strict. He asked me if I thought it was sad the way the young boy was acting towards his mother. I agreed with him and said it made me uncomfortable as that behavior at home does not transfer well to school and as a teacher I have to be the meany/bad person and ask a child not to act that way with classmates. I explained how I wished parents would think about behavior in other contexts and what example they were setting for their child.
The whole discussion was in a normal tone of voice and everyone around us was talking. I would have told the mother exactly the same thing as her son was abusive (from what I observed and clearly what this other gentleman perceived). I did not speak directly to the mother as it seemed she had her hands full and clearly speaking to her in front of a group of people would not make a good impression. I went back to what I was doing (reading something off my iPhone) and just backed up some more.
When the library opened, the typical crowding at the door occurred so I just waited. The young boy ran and pushed into others. The gentleman who had been talking with me commented – I don’t exactly even remember what he said. I was quite appalled the mother did not stop the son, even verbally. My comment to the man was that it was disappointing when parents lack parenting skills and the rest of us have to tolerate it, or in my case deal with it at school because the self same overall behavior (I observed between mother and son) to a classmate of the child would have been bullying.
Needless to say, the mother felt compelled to talk to me and tell me what a great relationship she had with her son and she did not understand the ‘problem’. I explained the problem was the behavior would not translate well to other situations. She was not pleased by this idea and tried to defend herself by saying I couldn’t understand as I don’t have a child. My final response was, no, I don’t understand as I have to manage 30-35 children at a time, not just one and the behavior is unacceptable. I completely lacked the courage to tell her I felt sorry for her and the fact that her child clearly took advantage of her or that it seemed she needed to set some boundaries. My guess is she has or will hear the message from some teacher at school as no one would tolerate the behavior.
While I only made my own quiet observation to go by, some one else felt the same way and spoke to me about it – I did not start the conversation. I have reason to believe other people were stymied by the unfortunate behavior and did not know what to say themselves.
So, for the record, bullying does not happen in isolation. Bullying does not suddenly come on the scene and is generally not learned at school from others – bullying is a behavior from home and the way a child perceives interactions between themselves and their parents, theirselves and their siblings and most of all, the interplay between mom and dad. It is unfortunate people feel so surprised by bullying when it is right within eyesight and earshot and even as some one who is outspoken, I did not quite have the words for this parent.

http://www.hirecentrix.com/how-to-handle-bullies-at-work.html

Bullying at school – when administrators master it and then look the other way

http://m.sfgate.com/sfchron/db_106665/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=nOrkIS7w

Yesterday morning as I was doing work at home I listened in on the discussion Michael Krasney on NPR was having with a variety of people on his show regarding bullying.  While bullying seems to be the new ‘in’ word to describe bad behavior, there is nothing new about it, most especially at schools.  If anything, bullying has become a tour de force set of behaviors that have only gotten the attention or notice deserved because of the most recent suicides and physical/emotional issues seeing the light of day.  In the past, it was almost unconscionable to talk about bullying, much like child or spousal abuse. Finally we are not stumbling over the carnage, we are addressing a very real issue affecting both students at school, the adults who work at the school and society at large.

http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2013-02/bullying-bosses-affect-more-just-their-targets

As I listened to to various callers, I could not help but well up and cry. I had not been bullied in any substantial way as a child, rather just the generic kids being kids being obnoxious behavior. Perhaps that is why as an adult it was so darn difficult to see the bullying happening to me and around me when I taught at Cal Prep (Aspire Public Schools) in Oakland, CA.

As a teacher at Cal Prep, I watched an 8th Grader , D,  beat up a 3rd Grader from Berkley Maynard at break. He was back at school a couple days later as the then principal wanted to ‘work things out’ since this particular student, although violent, scored high on tests. In my classroom, I had 7th Grade males calling one female, who shall go by J, double D.  At first I thought they may have been talking about a rapper and gave it the benefit of the doubt as J said it was okay. When it persisted and I knew it related to breast size, of which this student was large, I put the kabosh on – or at least I thought I did. The principal felt I was too caught up in the name calling taunts and needed to back off so the boys would stop.  I had a student who hated gays/fags and made it quite clear at PE. I called in the parents. The parents were all over it and took the student to task.  The principal again felt that it was just a typical behavior from these types of kids and to lay off and they would stop.  The group in charge of being the real discipline or guards at the school just happened to be some of the employees from The Black Muslim Brotherhood.

In a staff meeting, myself and another teacher stated we felt ishy about the school guards. I was later told by the principal in private that I needed to better understand the community I was serving, as in I am white, a portion of the community is black and essentially I was racist.  I later found out the uncomfortable feeling I had was because the school guards were ex cons and pretty much everyone in Oakland had an issue with them, black, white or other.

To add insult to the various physical and emotional injuries going on around me with students,  other teachers and myself were abused by the principal and administrative staff (V P’s) of Aspire Public Schools.  I was ultimately tormented for being exhausted and anemic (the precursors to needing a hysterectomy) because I was ‘letting down my colleagues’  and then needing surgery – the hysterectomy, which could have interfered with school testing because it could require 4-6 weeks of me beingh out of work. I was denied the help to pack up my classroom or unpack it, both with written medical requests from  the surgeon at Kaiser Permanente because the school was running low on funds and I just needed to figure it out.  At the same time I was being tormented, another teacher who had a reoccurence of breast cancer was similarly being tormented and ultimately fired. I chose to leave from the pervasive and continuous harrassment so according to FEHA rules and regulations, I made an admission of guilt to my poor teaching due to exhaustion/anemia, in spite of everything else going on around me and was with an employer who used an at will contract.  Another teacher (also a professor at Cal Berkeley) was physically and emotionally abused by the principal.  The teacher with breast cancer won an out of court settlement so it did not need to go to trial (Lawless and Lawless). The professor compelled UC Berkeley to take appropriate action. I was left high and dry because technically, I could be let go for wearing the wrong color dress (at will contract).  Another employee at our school who was diabetic, was regularly scorned and not allowed appropriate nutrition breaks.  And yet two other employees were variously asked to schedule ‘differntly’ their  medical appointments so it did not get in the way of the flow of the school as it was difficult to find substitute teachers/coverage.

In addition, the professors from the education department at UC Berkeley who were brought in as consultants, knew what was going on both with students and staff and let it pass. They did not want to get caught up in the politics.  Parents, one of which is an administrator at UC Berkeley, one an employee at the law library were allowed without compunction to hassle the teaching staff in a vareity of e-mails as they were on the school board and the principal wanted very badly to have good PR with these two parents.

At the point I quit, my family and friends were astounded by how willing I had been to accept the abuse for myself and possibly believe the principal might be right.  It took a while to understand I had been badly bullied by the principal, Aspire Public Schools, parents and my reaction was pretty reasonable considering the situation.  I was overcome with a horrible sense of guilt rather than realizing I was only trying to protect myself.

Not only was I witness to bullying being perpatrated and tolerated at the school, it was used on me and at least three other teachers quite effectively so the principal could exercise his ego.  The principal was promoted, another one came in.  Aspire calls all of this a learning experience. They are so good at bullying they can even put it in a nice package and hand it to you.

Update:   22 October 2010

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2026632,00.html

The end result is a educational leadership system that baffles people in the private as well as the public sector.
 The Army “is very clearly up or out,” says James Wilcox, a former Army officer and Blackhawk helicopter pilot who is now CEO of Aspire Public Schools, a network of high-performing charter schools in California.
 But in public schools, he says, “it’s up and stay.”
All of this would be easier to digest if I did not have the paperwork including a lawsuit against my previous principal, my FEHA/EEOC paperwork against my past principal and Aspire Public schools and know about my previous principals promotion out of the school to the administrative offices of Aspire Public Schools.  Aspire is no different than public schools, they just use different names and meanings in the same way Michelle Rhee practices anomoly theory.
http://www.hirecentrix.com/how-to-handle-bullies-at-work.html
http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/LA-charter-school-group-settles-sex-harass-claims-3660374.php
http://m.sfgate.com/sfchron/db_106665/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=u1clICqR&full=true#display

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.